THE EFFECT OF MOTIVATION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT PT. EGA WAYANG GARMINDO NORTH JAKARTA

Dewi  Lestari

doi:10.53067/ije3.v3i1.131

Authors

Dewi Lestari Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ije3.v3i1.131

Keywords:

Employee Performance, Work Environment , Motivation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how much influence motivation and work environment have on employee performance at PT. Ega Wayang Garmindo, North Jakarta, either partially or simultaneously. The research method uses a quantitative research method with a descriptive quantitative approach. The sample used in this study is a saturated sample, namely using the entire population of 57 people as a sample. Data analysis used validity test, reliability test, classical assumption test, regression analysis, correlation coefficient analysis, coefficient of determination analysis, and hypothesis testing. The results of the research show that there is a positive influence between employee motivation and performance partially. Where is the simple linear regression equation Y = 8.039 + 0.789 X1 means it has a positive effect, the correlation test r = 0.760 is included in the strong category, the coefficient of determination is 57.8% and the remaining 42.2% is influenced by other factors, the t test is tcount 8.684 > ttable 1.673 then Ha1 is accepted and Ho1 is rejected. The results showed that there was a positive influence between the work environment and employee performance partially. Where is the simple linear regression equation Y = 7.853 + 0.787 X2 means that it has a positive effect, the correlation test r = 0.861 is included in the very strong category, the coefficient of determination is 74.2% and the remaining 25.8% is influenced by other factors, the t test is tcount 12.578> ttable 1.673 then Ha2 is accepted and Ho2 is rejected. The results showed that there was a positive influence between the variables of motivation and work environment on employee performance simultaneously, where the multiple regression equation Y = 4.699 + 0.242 X1 + 0.622 X2 means a positive effect, multiple correlation test r = 0.874 is included in the very strong category, the coefficient of determination of 76.4% and the remaining 23.6% which is influenced by other factors, the f test of fcount 87.374 > ftable 3.168 means that it can be concluded that the variables of motivation and work environment have a significant effect on employee performance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A, Muri Yusuf.(2015).Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Kencana: Jakarta.

Adhari, Iendy Zelvian. (2021). Optimalisasi Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Pendekatan Knowledge Management & Motivasi Kerja. Jawa Timur: CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.

Afandi, P. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori, Konsep dan Indikator). Riau: Zanafa Publishing.

Anoraga, P.(2014).Manajemen Bisnis. Semarang : PT. Rineka Cipta.

Anwar Edy, Sutrisno, (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

_______, (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. (2013). Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : PT.Remaja

Ardana, Komang dkk.(2012). Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia. Yogyakarta :Graha Ilmu.

Asmalah, L., & Noviyanti, I. (2021). The effect of work discipline and work motivation on employee performance in PT. Struktur Pracetak Nasional Jakarta. Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 3(6), 54-65.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisi Multivariete Dengan Program Ibm SPSS 23 (Edisi 8) Cetakan Ke VIII . Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.

_______, (2017). Analisis Multivariat dan Ekonometrika dengan Eviews 10. Semarang: Badan

_______, (2018). Aplikasi Analisi Multivariete Dengan Program Ibm SPSS 23 (Edisi 8) Cetakan Ke VIII . Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro

Noviyanti, I., Fitria, J. R., & Asmalah, L. (2022). The effect of leadership and work motivation on employee performance in PT ISS Indonesia cleaning service division South Jakarta. International Journal of Economy, Education and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 468-476.

Noviyanti, I., & Ramadan, A. S. (2021). Pengaruh Kedisiplinan Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT. Mitra Pinanthika Mustika Rent Di Tangerang. Jurnal Arastirma, 1(1), 22-32.

Noviyanti, I., & Hijriatunnisa, E. M. (2022). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Pt. Angkasa Pura Propetindo di Bandara Soekarno Hatta. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Pariwisata dan Perhotelan, 1(2), 216-226.

Noviyanti, I., Hayati, F. A., Nufus, K., Maduningtias, L., Rostikawati, D., Sunarsi, D., & Effendy, A. A. (2020). Did Virtual Transformational Leadership Style Influence Schools Performance? Answer form Indonesian Senior High Schools. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 8438-8461.

Suryani, Nur, and Nur Syahida. 2018. “Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja Fisik, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Perangkat Desa.” Economic Education Analysis Journal 2(1):1–14.

Veithzal Rivai. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Widodo. 2015. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar