THE INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION AND QUALITY SERVICES ON PURCHASING DECISION FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SERVICE AT ALFAMIDI KUTABUMI

Authors

  • Agung Tri Putranto Pamulang University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ije3.v1i2.17

Keywords:

Promotion, Service Quality , Electronic Transaction Decisions

Abstract

The title of this research is “the impact of promotion and quality services on purchasing decision for electronic transaction service at alfamidi kutabumi”. this study aims to determine the significance of the effect of promotion and service quality partially and simultaneously on electronic transaction decisions at Alfamidi Kutabumi. This study uses quantitative methods, the number of populations is not known for sure so that based on the Rao Purba formula, the number of samples is 96.4 and is rounded up to 100 respondents by the researcher. Technical analysis of instrument test data (validity test, reliability test), classical assumption test (normality test, multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test), hypothesis testing (t-test, F test). From the results of the research, the X 1 variable has a significant effect on the Y variable with the regression equation Y = 9.450 + 0.230 X 1, the correlation value of 0.579 means that the two variables have a moderate level of relationship with a coefficient of determination of 33.5%. Hypothesis test obtained t arithmetic > t table or (7.033 > 1.984). Thus H 0 is rejected and H 1 accepted. Variable X 2 has a significant effect on variable Y with the regression equation Y = 9.294 + 0.375 X 2, the correlation value is 0.570, meaning that both have a moderate level of relationship with a coefficient of determination of 32.4%. Hypothesis test obtained t count > t table or (6.859 > 1.984). Variables X 1 and X 2 simultaneously have a significant effect on variable Y with the regression equation Y = 4.407 + 0.158X 1 + 0.249X 2 . The correlation value of 0.667 means that the independent variable and the dependent variable have a strong relationship with a coefficient of determination of 44.5% while the remaining 55.5% is influenced by other factors. Hypothesis test obtained value of F arithmetic > F table or (38.891 > 2,700). Thus H 0 is rejected and H 3 is accepted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amanullang, M. Management basics . Bandung: Cita Pustaka, 2015.

Ariani, D. W. 2010. Statistical Quality Control . Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Research Procedures: A Practical Approach. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta

Baum, Figen. 2012. Integrated Quality Control (over language). Jakarta:Erlangga

Guspul. Ahmad. 2014. The Influence of Service Quality and Trust in Customer Satisfaction (*Study on Customers of Kospin Jasa Wonosobo Branch. PPKM UNSIQ Journal 40-54

Handoko, T. Hani. 2016. Management. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.

Hasibuan, Malaysia. SP 2014. Human Resource Management (Revised Edition). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kotler, and Keller, (2012). Marketing Management. Edition 12. Jakarta: Erlangga Kotler,

Kotler, Philip, and Gary Armstrong. 2012. Principles of Marketing. edition 13. Volume 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kotler, Philip, and Gery Armstrong. 2015. Marketing Fundamentals, Translation, Issue 3, Volume 1. Jakarta: Intermedia.

Kotler, Philip and Kevin Lane Keller.2019.Marketing Management. Linguist Bob Sabran. Issue 13 Volume 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Lupioyadi. 2016. Competency-Based Service Marketing Management, Salemba Empat Publisher, Jakarta.

P and K. L. Keller, 2008. Marketing Management. Thirteenth Edition. Jakarta: Prenhalindo.

Parasuraman, Berry. Et.all. 2011. Quality Counts in Service Too Business Harizoon. New York: Milan

Priyatno, Dwi. 2016. Learn Data Analysis Tools and Processing Methods With SPSS Practical and Easy to Understand for Beginner and Intermediate Levels. Yogyakarta: Gava Media

Putranto, Agung Tri. 2018, Effect of Product Attributes, Promotion and Variety Seeking on Brand Switching. Jakarta

Rambat, Lumpiyadi and Hamdani. 2011. Service Marketing Management. Jakarta : PT. Salemba Four.

Sanusi.2011. Business Research methodology. Jakarta: Salemba Four.

Stoner and Freeman, 2012. Management. Surabaya.Gramedia.

Sugiono. (2012). Quantitative Research Management. Bandung: Bandung

Sugiono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta, CV.

Sugiyono. 2010. Statistics for Research, Bandung: Alphabeta.

Sugiyono. 2013. Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D. Bandung: Alphabeta

Swastha, Basu and Handoko, T Hani. 2014. Marketing Management, Yogyakarta: BPFE

Terry, George R. 2009. Management Principles. Jakarta: Earth Literacy Publisher

Tjiptono, Fandy. 2008. Marketing Business Strategy. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Tjiptono, Fandy. 2014. Service Marketing. Andi : Yogyakarta.

Tjiptono, Fandy. 2014. Marketing strategy. Yogyakarta: CV ANDI OFFset

Tjiptono, Fandy. Ph.D. 2015. Marketing Strategy, 4th Edition, Andi Publisher. Yogyakarta.

Tjiptono, Fandy., 2012. Service Management, Edition II. Third printing. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Tjiptono, Fandy., 2013. Service Management, Edition II. Third printing. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Downloads

Published

2021-08-01

How to Cite

Putranto, A. T. . (2021). THE INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION AND QUALITY SERVICES ON PURCHASING DECISION FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SERVICE AT ALFAMIDI KUTABUMI . International Journal of Economy, Education and Entrepreneurship (IJE3), 1(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.53067/ije3.v1i2.17